join REAP

Interested in joining REAP? Follow the steps:

1. Email, fax or mail us
a Letter of Authorization
a copy of your most recent electric bill
2. Contact us to find out more OR fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you with more information!

What do you get as a REAP member?

  • A team of friendly, knowledgeable, engineering and economics professionals with over 125 years of combined utility and electrical experience to help you understand and manage your electric purchasing and distribution costs.
  • Finally… someone who you can refer your pesky sales calls to from the over 200 electric suppliers that are hounding you for your business.
  • A free lighting audit, to help you reduce your electric costs even further by installing more cost and energy efficient lighting fixtures.
  • An honest, local, ethical, family-owned Pennsylvania based company that always keeps the best interests of its customers first and foremost.
  • The ability for you to work on your business… while REG focuses on your electric!

Contact Information

Your Name *

Company *

Type of Business *

Address *

Phone Number *


Email *




Account Information


Number of accounts

Utility Billing Rate

Average Monthly Bill ($)

Annual kWh

How did you hear about REG?

Your Message

Tell us you are NOT a robot (required)


Recent Posts

FERC’s ‘Demand Response’ Rule Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court – Bloomberg

Today the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Demand Response programs. From Bloomberg:

FERC’s ‘Demand Response’ Rule Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court
Greg Stohr
January 25, 2016 — 10:03 AM EST Updated on January 25, 2016 — 10:14 AM EST

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to power generators, upholding a federal rule aimed at encouraging industrial consumers to cut electricity use.
The justices, voting 6-2, said the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission acted within its authority with the order, which sets rates for an energy-saving practice known as “demand response.” The court also upheld the formula used by FERC.
The ruling is a missed opportunity for the country’s biggest energy generators, which were seeking a chance to widen their profits. A decision invalidating the rule would have benefited NRG Energy Inc., FirstEnergy Corp., Exelon Corp., Dynegy Inc., Talen Energy Corp., Calpine Corp., Public Service Enterprise Group and American Electric Power Co.
Major energy consumers, including aluminum producer Alcoa Inc., backed the rule, as did smart-grid companies such as EnerNOC Inc., which help large consumers reduce their power use.
The case centered on the U.S. Federal Power Act, which lets FERC regulate rates only at the wholesale level and leaves retail regulation in the hands of the states.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote the court’s majority opinion. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. Justice Samuel Alito didn’t take part in the case because of a stock holding.


  1. Energy savings brought to light Leave a reply
  2. Shutdown of two FirstEnergy power plants may be delayed Leave a reply