Utility Bill Audits

Utility Bill Audits

REG offers several decades of utility-related experience and industry knowledge of end-user utility issues, such as negotiating favorable utility contracts for dual-line supply, and resolving electric utility issues associated with facility expansions. We also have great experience in reviewing customer bills for accuracy, evaluate alternative utility rate structures, and interface with utilities to resolve billing errors and pursue credits and refunds on behalf of our clients.

  • Rate-saving Primary Conversion analysis (from secondary metering to primary metering). Services include project management and installation via a sub-contractor
  • Perform billing audits and secure refunds from Electric Utilities
  • Evaluate available alternative utility rate structures, including special or innovative rates
  • Maximize business exemptions and incentives
  • Evaluate the consolidation of multiple “electric metering” points and perform the necessary rate savings analysis

us about utility bill consulting!

Recent Posts

FERC’s ‘Demand Response’ Rule Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court – Bloomberg

Today the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Demand Response programs. From Bloomberg:

FERC’s ‘Demand Response’ Rule Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court
Greg Stohr
January 25, 2016 — 10:03 AM EST Updated on January 25, 2016 — 10:14 AM EST

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to power generators, upholding a federal rule aimed at encouraging industrial consumers to cut electricity use.
The justices, voting 6-2, said the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission acted within its authority with the order, which sets rates for an energy-saving practice known as “demand response.” The court also upheld the formula used by FERC.
The ruling is a missed opportunity for the country’s biggest energy generators, which were seeking a chance to widen their profits. A decision invalidating the rule would have benefited NRG Energy Inc., FirstEnergy Corp., Exelon Corp., Dynegy Inc., Talen Energy Corp., Calpine Corp., Public Service Enterprise Group and American Electric Power Co.
Major energy consumers, including aluminum producer Alcoa Inc., backed the rule, as did smart-grid companies such as EnerNOC Inc., which help large consumers reduce their power use.
The case centered on the U.S. Federal Power Act, which lets FERC regulate rates only at the wholesale level and leaves retail regulation in the hands of the states.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote the court’s majority opinion. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. Justice Samuel Alito didn’t take part in the case because of a stock holding.

(Source)

  1. Energy savings brought to light Leave a reply
  2. Shutdown of two FirstEnergy power plants may be delayed Leave a reply